“More Than a Blonde Bombshell: Marilyn Monroe and the Male Gaze”

The concept of the male gaze, introduced by feminist theorist Laura Mulvey in her 1975 essay “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema“, revolutionised men’s view of women’s portrayal in cinema. Mulvey explained that films, particularly in Hollywood, are predominantly structured through the eyes of the male protagonist and male directors, reducing women to objects of male desire. Marilyn Monroe, one of Hollywood’s most iconic figures, is frequently seen through the male gaze in her roles, where her body becomes the focus rather than her character development.

Objectification in “River of No Return”

(Monroe, 2018)

In River of No Return (1954), Monroe plays Kay, a showgirl, and the male gaze is evident from the start. The camera often zooms in on her body, especially her legs, turning them into the dominant visual element of her character. This is a prime example of objectification, where Monroe’s body is fragmented into sexualised parts for the pleasure of the male viewer. The focus on her curves rather than her emotions reduces her to a passive object of desire. This aligns with the concept of scopophilia, or the “primordial wish for pleasurable looking” Mulvey identifies as central to the cinematic experience. The audience is invited to voyeuristically gaze at Monroe, detached from her inner life.

It can be seen that such objectification goes beyond the frame and determines how the viewers see Monroe herself. As Mulvey argued, the so-called ‘male gaze’ teaches some viewers to regard women as passive and to ignore their intricacies. As in many other roles, Monroe’s character in River of No Return has no meaning except to assist the story dominated by the male lead. While the male lead commands the stage, Monroe’s character is confined to being the object of his desire, reinforcing the traditional roles of male action and female passivity.

Bombshell

(Bowman, 2019)

Monroe’s public image also invites the construction of self-objectification. The culture industry and society commoditised her personality as a woman of beauty whose worth was in her looks. For instance, the famous platinum blonde hair was not just a style but a standard of beauty envisioned as white and extremely feminine. Such an image presenting Monroe was produced by Hollywood, an industry run by men, so she had to conform to these externally imposed expectations to maintain her career.

Behind the Scenes

In addition, masculine dominance, the basis of the male gaze, was present throughout Monroe’s life. She was surrounded by male directors, producers, and editors who controlled how women were to be represented in the media, and this further embedded the ideology that women were merely dormant entities who existed primarily for male gratification. Media often reinforce sexualised femininity through patriarchal structures, as seen in figures like Marilyn Monroe. Her objectified image emerged from societal frameworks rather than being self-constructed, reflecting how mainstream media upholds traditional gender roles and reinforces patriarchal power (Hooks, 1995).

Monroe’s portrayal in River of No Return exemplifies the male gaze in Hollywood cinema. Through Mulvey’s theory, she is not a fully developed character but a sexual object, reduced to visual pleasure for the male viewer. While Monroe’s beauty may have empowered some women, it also reinforced harmful patriarchal ideals that value women primarily for their appearance. Mulvey’s work encourages a reconsideration of women’s representation and challenges us to subvert the male gaze for more authentic portrayals of women.

Reference

Bowman, J. (2019). 38 Rare Color Photos of ‘Smiling’ Marilyn Monroe That You May Have Never Seen Before. [online] Pinterest. Available at: https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/422916221256967732/ [Accessed 26 Nov. 2024].

Hooks, B. (2017). Feminist theory : from margin to center. [online] Boston, Mass.: South End Press. Available at: https://funceji.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/bell_hooks_feminist_theory_from_margin_to_centebookzz-org_.pdf [Accessed 24 Nov. 2024].

Loreck, J. (2016). Explainer: what does the ‘male gaze’ mean, and what about a female gaze? [online] The Conversation. Available at: https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-does-the-male-gaze-mean-and-what-about-a-female-gaze-52486.

Monroe, M. (2018). Marilyn Monroe In ‘River Of No Return’ – ‘One Silver Dollar’. [online] YouTube. Available at: https://youtu.be/MILQU_xcUvk?si=-4Trrv8V04wiK2_3 [Accessed 26 Nov. 2024].

Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. [online] Available at: https://doubleoperative.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/mulvey-visual-pleasure.pdf [Accessed 25 Nov. 2024].

Vanbuskirk, S. (2022). What Is the Male Gaze? [online] Verywell Mind. Available at: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-the-male-gaze-5118422

1 thought on ““More Than a Blonde Bombshell: Marilyn Monroe and the Male Gaze”

  1. Hi Maria!
    This blog does a great job of unpacking the male gaze using Marilyn Monroe as an example. Your analysis of River of No Return really highlights how Monroe’s character was framed more as a visual spectacle than as a fully developed individual. I particularly liked how you connected Mulvey’s idea of scopophilia to the way the audience is encouraged to view Monroe—detached and focused on her appearance rather than her emotions or actions. Your section on Monroe’s public image also adds an important layer, showing how the male gaze extends beyond the screen into her real-life persona. The idea that her image was shaped by male-dominated Hollywood and turned into a commodity is both compelling and heartbreaking. It’s a reminder of how societal structures influence not just characters but the lives of the actors themselves. Your blog is a thoughtful and engaging critique that challenges readers to think about how media representations of women are constructed and consumed. Great work!

Leave a Reply